ConvexPi

Market underreaction to open market share repurchases

David Ikenberry, Josef Lakonishok, Theo Vermaelen

Journal of Financial Economics · 1995 · 1838 citations

Quality
Community wiki✎ Edit⟲ History

Market Underreaction to Open Market Share Repurchases


Source: Ikenberry, D., Lakonishok, J. & Vermaelen, T. (1995) · Journal of Financial Economics 39(2–3), 181–208 · DOI 10.1016/0304-405X(95)00826-Z


TL;DR

Firms announcing open-market share repurchases earn positive long-run abnormal returns: the average four-year buy-and-hold abnormal return after the announcement is 12.1%, and it is concentrated in value (high book-to-market) firms at 45.3%, while "glamour" (low book-to-market) firms show no positive drift. The market underreacts to the buyback signal — managers' implicit "our stock is cheap" message is only slowly incorporated. Based on 1,239 announcements over 1980–1990 (NYSE/ASE/NASDAQ).


What anomaly it documents

  • Predictor: open-market repurchase announcement (event), interacted with book-to-market.
  • Direction: positive — buyback announcers, especially value firms, earn positive future abnormal returns.
  • Shape: post-event drift over multiple years; concentrated where management's undervaluation signal is most credible (value stocks). Evidence of underreaction to a corporate signal.
  • OSAP predictor: share repurchase / buyback announcement drift.

  • How to construct it

  • Identify open-market repurchase announcements (here 1,239 firms, 1980–1990).
  • Compute long-run (up to four-year) buy-and-hold abnormal returns versus size/book-to-market-matched reference portfolios.
  • Split the sample by book-to-market quintile to isolate the value vs. glamour pattern.

  • Evidence and replication

    Group4-year abnormal BHARSource
    All repurchasing firms+12.1%this paper
    Value (high-BM) repurchasers+45.3%this paper
    Glamour (low-BM) repurchasersNo positive driftthis paper

    Why it might work

  • Underreaction to a credible undervaluation signal from insiders.
  • The concentration in value firms fits the signaling interpretation: cheap firms buy back when genuinely undervalued, and the market is slow to revalue them.

  • Limitations and risks

  • Long-run abnormal-return measurement is sensitive to the benchmark and bad-model problems (Fama, 1998).
  • Buyback motives have shifted (e.g., offsetting option dilution, payout substitution), possibly weakening the signal over time.
  • Four-year holding periods imply long capital lock-up and overlapping-event statistical issues.

  • Key references

  • Ikenberry, D., Lakonishok, J. & Vermaelen, T. (1995) — Market Underreaction to Open Market Share Repurchases — Journal of Financial Economics
  • Loughran, T. & Ritter, J. (1995) — The New Issues Puzzle — Journal of Finance
  • Fama, E. (1998) — Market Efficiency, Long-Term Returns, and Behavioral Finance — Journal of Financial Economics



  • Provenance: verified/generated from the paper's full text.


    Community-maintained wiki — anyone can suggest an edit or view its revision history. Not peer-reviewed; verify claims against the original paper.

    Wiki last updated: June 22, 2026