ConvexPi

Depression Babies: Do Macroeconomic Experiences Affect Risk Taking?*

Ulrike Malmendier, Stefan Nagel

The Quarterly Journal of Economics · 2011 · 2521 citations

Low Vol
Community wiki✎ Edit⟲ History

Depression Babies: Do Macroeconomic Experiences Affect Risk Taking?


Source: Malmendier, U. & Nagel, S. (2011) · Quarterly Journal of Economics 126(1), 373–416 · DOI: 10.1093/qje/qjq004


The idea

Personally-lived macroeconomic history shapes financial risk-taking. Individuals who have experienced

low stock-market returns over their own lifetimes report lower willingness to take financial risk,

are less likely to participate in the stock market, and — conditional on participating — hold a

smaller equity share. Those who experienced low bond returns are less likely to own bonds.

Recent experiences carry more weight than distant ones, but early-life experiences still matter decades

later — a departure from rational expectations that weight all available history equally.


Evidence

  • Data: Survey of Consumer Finances, 1964–2004, used to build four risk-taking measures (willingness
  • to bear risk, stock participation, bond participation, equity share of liquid assets).

  • Each measure is related to the household's lifetime-experienced stock/bond returns, with a
  • flexible weighting function governed by an estimated parameter λ: λ estimated > 0 means weights

    decline with how long ago the return occurred (recent experiences weigh more); estimated λ values

    are similar across the four risk-taking measures.

  • All results control for age effects, year effects, wealth and income, distinguishing experience
  • effects from life-cycle and aggregate-time effects.

  • Effects are stronger for younger households (a given experience is a larger share of their short
  • history). Example: low young-household participation in the early 1980s (after weak 1970s returns) vs.

    high participation in the late 1990s (after the boom).

  • In aggregate, investors' lifetime stock-return experiences help predict the price–earnings ratio.

  • Why it matters

    A landmark in behavioral / experience-based learning. It explains persistent cohort differences in

    risk-taking and informs models of belief formation, the equity-premium puzzle, and household finance.


    Caveats

  • Survey-based; separating experience from cohort/time effects relies on the imposed weighting structure
  • and the age/year controls.

  • The experience-weighting (λ) is estimated, not micro-founded; the paper does not fully separate the
  • preferences vs. beliefs channel.


    Key references

  • Malmendier, U. & Nagel, S. (2011) — Depression Babies — Quarterly Journal of Economics
  • Malmendier, U. & Nagel, S. (2016) — Learning from Inflation Experiences — Quarterly Journal of Economics
  • Vissing-Jørgensen, A. (2003) — Perspectives on Behavioral Finance — NBER Macroeconomics Annual


  • Provenance: verified/generated from the paper's full text.


    Community-maintained wiki — anyone can suggest an edit or view its revision history. Not peer-reviewed; verify claims against the original paper.

    Wiki last updated: June 24, 2026