ConvexPi

Time series momentum

Tobias J. Moskowitz, Yao Hua Ooi, Lasse Heje Pedersen

Journal of Financial Economics · 2011 · 1398 citations

Momentum
Community wiki✎ Edit⟲ History

Time Series Momentum


Source: Moskowitz, T. J., Ooi, Y. H. & Pedersen, L. H. (2012). Journal of Financial Economics

104(2), 228–250.


TL;DR

An asset's own past 12-month excess return predicts its future return. A strategy that goes long

instruments with positive trailing-year returns and short those with negative returns, each scaled

to a constant volatility, earns a large, diversified Sharpe ratio across 58 futures and forwards —

and crucially delivers positive returns during equity market crises ("crisis alpha").


What anomaly it documents

Time-series (absolute) momentum is distinct from cross-sectional momentum: it depends only on an

asset's own past return, not its rank against peers. Past 12-month returns positively predict the

next ~1–12 months, after which returns partially reverse — the signature of initial underreaction

followed by delayed overreaction. The effect is remarkably consistent across equity indices, bonds,

commodities, and currencies.


How to construct it

  • Signal: the sign of each instrument's past 12-month excess return (long if positive, short if
  • negative). Some implementations scale by the return's magnitude or use multiple lookbacks.

  • Position sizing: scale each position to a target volatility using an ex-ante volatility
  • estimate, so no single instrument dominates.

  • Universe: diversify across asset classes (equity-index, bond, FX, and commodity futures).
  • Rebalancing: monthly.
  • ConvexPi replication: a single-asset version on the U.S. equity market — hold the market long
  • when its trailing 12-month excess return is positive and short when negative, rebalanced monthly.

    This is a deliberately minimal proxy for the diversified, vol-scaled factor in the paper.


    Evidence and replication

    PeriodSharpeSource
    IS (1985–2009, diversified TSMOM factor)~1.4 gross, strongly positive in 2008this paper
    OOS (post-2012, ConvexPi single-asset market version)0.48 (vs 0.17 pre-2012)ConvexPi benchmark

    The diversified factor's Sharpe is far higher than the single-asset replication because most of

    TSMOM's strength comes from diversification across dozens of trends; our minimal market-only version

    nonetheless remains positive out of sample. Note the OOS estimate is flattered by the short

    post-2012 window and the strong 2020 and 2022 trends.


    Why it might work

  • Underreaction then overreaction: investors are slow to update to new information, then
  • extrapolate, producing trends that persist before reversing.

  • Risk transfer / hedging demand: speculators earn a premium for absorbing hedgers' positions.
  • Crisis alpha: trends tend to persist during prolonged drawdowns, so trend following often
  • profits when equities fall — a diversification benefit, not just a return source.


    Limitations and risks

  • Whipsaw: in choppy, trendless, mean-reverting markets the strategy bleeds via repeated reversals.
  • Capacity and costs: large in liquid futures, but turnover and slippage matter at scale.
  • Robustness debate: Huang, Li, Wang & Zhou (2019), Time Series Momentum: Is It There?, argue
  • the effect is statistically fragile once the near-always-long tilt and time-varying means are

    accounted for — a useful caution that the headline result is sensitive to specification.


    Key references

  • Moskowitz, T., Ooi, Y. H. & Pedersen, L. (2012) — Time Series Momentum — Journal of Financial Economics
  • Hurst, B., Ooi, Y. H. & Pedersen, L. (2017) — A Century of Evidence on Trend-Following Investing — Journal of Portfolio Management
  • Huang, D., Li, J., Wang, L. & Zhou, G. (2019) — Time Series Momentum: Is It There? — Journal of Financial Economics
  • Asness, C., Moskowitz, T. & Pedersen, L. (2013) — Value and Momentum Everywhere — Journal of Finance

  • Reference replication on ConvexPi


    An open, verified replication of this strategy is maintained at convexpi/replications. It recomputes the strategy from underlying building blocks and scores it out of sample (the McLean & Pontiff test):


    PeriodAnnualized Sharpe
    In-sample (pre-2012)+0.09
    Out-of-sample (≥ 2012)+0.41
    Last 10 years+0.39

    Verdict: alive. Run it on live data in Colab · view the code


    Community-maintained wiki — anyone can suggest an edit or view its revision history. Not peer-reviewed; verify claims against the original paper.

    Wiki last updated: June 25, 2026