The Impact of Uncertainty Shocks
Source: Bloom, N. (2009). Econometrica 77(3), 623–685.
TL;DR
Shows that spikes in uncertainty — measured by jumps in stock-market volatility (e.g. the VIX) around
events like the Cuban Missile Crisis, JFK's assassination, OPEC I, and 9/11 — cause sharp, short
drops and rebounds in investment, hiring, and output. Faced with more uncertainty, firms adopt a
"wait-and-see" posture (real-options effect), pausing irreversible investment and hiring until the fog
clears; activity then rebounds and overshoots.
The idea
A structural framework linking financial-market uncertainty (a second-moment shock) to real activity,
distinct from the well-studied first-moment (levels) shocks. Bloom builds a heterogeneous-firm model
with a time-varying second moment and a mix of convex and non-convex labor and capital adjustment
costs, solves it numerically, and estimates it on firm-level data via simulated method of moments.
Mechanism
irreversible investment and hiring; productivity growth also falls as reallocation across units freezes.
employment, and productivity ("volatility overshoot").
Evidence
HP-detrended mean (implied volatility rises by up to ~200%) — roughly one every three years.
drop-and-rebound lasting roughly 6 months and an overshoot from month 7–8 onward; first-moment
(interest-rate / stock-level) shocks instead produce a slower drop-rebound lasting 2–3 years.
timing; ignoring capital adjustment costs biases estimates substantially, ignoring labor costs less so.
Why it matters
The foundational paper linking measured volatility/uncertainty to macro fluctuations; it established the
"second-moment shock" research program, motivated the EPU index (Baker-Bloom-Davis) and the
macro-uncertainty literature, and legitimized the VIX as a real-economy signal.
Caveats
contested.
Key references
Provenance: verified/generated from the paper's full text.
