ConvexPi

Value-Glamour and Accruals Mispricing: One Anomaly or Two?

Hemang Desai, Shivaram Rajgopal, Mohan Venkatachalam

The Accounting Review · 2004 · 422 citations

Value
Community wiki✎ Edit⟲ History

Value-Glamour and Accruals Mispricing: One Anomaly or Two?


Source: Desai, Rajgopal & Venkatachalam (2004) · The Accounting Review · DOI: 10.2308/accr.2004.79.2.355


TL;DR


The accruals anomaly and the value-glamour effect are deeply related. Using cash-flow-to-price (C/P) — which captures both — the authors show accruals and value-glamour are largely the same phenomenon: low-accrual value stocks (high C/P) and high-accrual glamour stocks lie on a single mispricing continuum, with C/P a parsimonious summary signal.


What anomaly it documents


  • Predictor: cash-flow-to-price (C/P), unifying accruals and value-glamour.
  • Direction: positive — high C/P (cheap, low-accrual) firms earn higher returns.
  • Shape: C/P subsumes much of accruals and value-glamour as one anomaly.
  • OSAP predictor: cfp.

  • How to construct it


  • Sorting variable: operating cash flow to price (C/P).
  • Universe: firms with statements.
  • Portfolio formation: rank into C/P deciles.
  • Long / short: long high C/P, short low.
  • Weighting: equal-weighted.
  • Rebalancing: annual.

  • Evidence and replication


    PeriodNotesSource
    IS (1973–1997)C/P unifies accruals and value-glamour mispricingthis paper
    OOS (post-2004)cash-flow value persists; accrual leg weakerpost-publication
    OSAP (cfp)replicatesChen & Zimmermann 2022

    Why it might work


  • Earnings fixation: investors over-rely on earnings and underweight cash flows.
  • Single mispricing: value-glamour and accruals reflect the same extrapolation error.

  • Limitations and risks


  • Value overlap: correlated with B/M, E/P.
  • Accrual decay: the accrual component has weakened.
  • Fundamentals dependence: needs cash-flow data.

  • Key references


  • Desai, H., Rajgopal, S. & Venkatachalam, M. (2004) — Value-Glamour and Accruals Mispricing: One Anomaly or Two? — TAR — DOI: 10.2308/accr.2004.79.2.355



  • Provenance: generated from the paper's abstract and metadata, not full text; sample periods and replication notes are indicative — verify against the source.

    Community-maintained wiki — anyone can suggest an edit or view its revision history. Not peer-reviewed; verify claims against the original paper.

    Wiki last updated: June 27, 2026