Uncertainty about Government Policy and Stock Prices
Source: Pástor & Veronesi (2012) · Journal of Finance 67(4), 1219–1264 · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2012.01746.x
TL;DR
A general-equilibrium model in which the government is an active decision maker with both economic and non-economic motives. Stock prices fall, on average, at announcements of policy changes; the fall is larger when policy uncertainty is high and when the change follows a short or shallow downturn. Policy changes raise volatility, risk premia, and correlations among stocks, and the jump risk premium associated with policy decisions is positive on average.
The question
How do changes in government policy affect stock prices, given that policy changes are endogenous — the government tends to change policy after performance downturns in the private sector — and that uncertainty about policy is an inevitable by-product of policymaking?
The model
Firm profitability follows a stochastic process whose mean is shifted by the prevailing government policy. The model features two distinct uncertainties (note the paper's terminology):
The government chooses whether to switch policy by weighing economic welfare and a non-economic (political-cost) component; investors learn about the impact of the current and prospective policies from realized profitability. Policy decisions generate a jump in prices at announcement. The government tends to act after downturns, making policy change effectively a (costly) option exercised in weak states.
Key predictions
Empirical status
Predictions are broadly consistent with evidence of elevated volatility, correlations, and risk premia around elections and major policy events, and with measured economic-policy-uncertainty indices (Baker-Bloom-Davis). The companion Pástor-Veronesi (2013) extends the framework to political uncertainty and risk premia with supporting empirical tests.
Limitations
Key references
Provenance: verified/generated from the paper's full text.
