ConvexPi

Value and Momentum Everywhere

Clifford S. Asness, Tobias J. Moskowitz, Lasse Heje Pedersen

The Journal of Finance · 2013 · 2223 citations

MomentumValue
Community wiki✎ Edit⟲ History

Value and Momentum Everywhere


Source: Asness, C. S., Moskowitz, T. J. & Pedersen, L. H. (2013). Journal of Finance 68(3),

929–985.


TL;DR

Value and momentum are not equity quirks: both earn premia **consistently across eight markets and

asset classes** — individual stocks in the US, UK, Europe and Japan, plus country equity indices,

government bonds, currencies, and commodities. Value and momentum are negatively correlated, so a

combined value-plus-momentum portfolio diversifies beautifully, and both load on common global

factors, including funding-liquidity risk.


What anomaly it documents

A unified, global factor structure: value (cheap minus expensive) and momentum (recent winners minus

losers) appear everywhere, with correlated value strategies across asset classes and correlated

momentum strategies across asset classes — pointing to common drivers rather than asset-specific stories.


How to construct it

  • Value signal: an asset-class-appropriate cheapness measure (book-to-market for stocks, 5-year
  • reversal / real yields / spot-relative measures for other classes).

  • Momentum signal: the past ~12-month return (skipping the most recent month).
  • Form long-short value and momentum portfolios within each market, then combine; the 50/50
  • value+momentum mix has a far higher Sharpe than either alone.


    Evidence and replication

    StrategyResultSource
    Value or momentum, single classPositive but volatilethis paper
    Combined value+momentum, globalMuch higher Sharpe; value-momentum correlation strongly negativethis paper

    The combined factor's strength comes from the negative value-momentum correlation; both also carry

    liquidity-risk exposure that partly explains their returns.


    Why it might work

  • Common global risks (notably funding-liquidity risk) plus behavioural underreaction/overreaction.
  • The negative value-momentum correlation suggests they capture complementary mispricings.

  • Limitations and risks

  • Implementation costs and shorting constraints differ sharply across asset classes.
  • Both strategies have crash risk; the combination mitigates but does not eliminate it.

  • Key references

  • Asness, C., Moskowitz, T. & Pedersen, L. (2013) — Value and Momentum Everywhere — Journal of Finance
  • Fama, E. & French, K. (1992) — The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns — Journal of Finance
  • Jegadeesh, N. & Titman, S. (1993) — Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers — Journal of Finance

  • Community-maintained wiki — anyone can suggest an edit or view its revision history. Not peer-reviewed; verify claims against the original paper.

    Wiki last updated: June 22, 2026