Accounting Valuation, Market Expectation, and Cross-Sectional Stock Returns
Source: Frankel & Lee (1998) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · DOI: 10.1016/s0165-4101(98)00026-3
TL;DR
Frankel & Lee estimate each firm's fundamental value (V) from analyst forecasts via a residual-income model, then show the value-to-price (V/P) ratio predicts long-run cross-sectional returns: firms cheap relative to their analyst-based intrinsic value outperform. The effect survives controls for beta, book-to-price, and size.
What anomaly it documents
Predictor: value-to-price ratio (V/P), with V from a residual-income model on I/B/E/S forecasts.
Mispricing: the market underweights forecast-implied fundamentals.
Better value metric: V/P conditions cheapness on expected profitability, unlike raw B/P.
Limitations and risks
Forecast dependence: requires analyst estimates and model assumptions.
Coverage: limited to followed firms.
Value overlap: correlated with book-to-price.
Key references
Frankel, R. & Lee, C. (1998) — Accounting Valuation, Market Expectation, and Cross-Sectional Stock Returns — JAE — DOI: 10.1016/s0165-4101(98)00026-3
Provenance: generated from the paper's abstract and metadata, not full text; sample periods and replication notes are indicative — verify against the source.