Market Liquidity and Funding Liquidity
Source: Brunnermeier, M. K. & Pedersen, L. H. (2009) · Review of Financial Studies 22(6), 2201–2238 · DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hhn098
The question
How are market liquidity (the ease of trading an asset) and funding liquidity (the ease with
which traders finance positions) connected, and why does market liquidity sometimes evaporate suddenly,
comove across assets, and dry up most for high-margin, volatile securities — as in the 2007–09 crisis?
The model
every long and short position must be financed out of own capital, so total margins cannot exceed a
trader's capital at any time.
determined**: tighter funding makes speculators cut positions — especially capital-intensive,
high-margin ones — which widens spreads and raises volatility.
mark-to-market losses erode capital ("loss spiral"). Under stated conditions margins are
destabilizing, so the two liquidities are mutually reinforcing → liquidity spirals.
Key predictions
The model gives a unified explanation for documented features of market liquidity, predicting that it:
(i) can suddenly dry up; (ii) has commonality across securities; (iii) is **related to
volatility; (iv) is subject to flight to quality/liquidity; and (v) comoves with the market**.
New testable implications: a shock to speculator capital is a priced state variable; margins and dealer
funding drive market liquidity; and liquidity risk should carry a premium.
Empirical status
A core theoretical reference for liquidity crises and systemic risk. It rationalizes the empirical
commonality-in-liquidity and liquidity-risk-premium findings (Amihud; Pástor–Stambaugh; Acharya–
Pedersen) and closely fits the dynamics of the 2007–09 crisis.
Limitations
search) are largely abstracted away.
Key references
Provenance: verified/generated from the paper's full text.
